Connecticut Department of Labor
  Home About Us FAQ News and Notices Contact Us
Report a Fatality or Catastrophe Consultation Services Training and Calendar of Events Directions/Office Information

 

CONN-OSHA Quarterly

Volume No. 48
Winter 2007

Powered Industrial Trucks (Fork Truck):  Fork Extensions, Modifications and Attachments
By: Jeff Carter  Safety Consultant
 

The stability of any powered industrial truck (fork truck) must account for two planes of action: side to side or lateral stabil-ity, and forward and back or longitudinal stability. The capac-ity (and stability) of a fork truck is based not only on the load weight but also the position of a load on the forks. Even though a given load may be within the maximum load rating of a fork truck, it can cause the fork truck to become unstable if the center of gravity of the load is located beyond the point on which the rating is based. That distance is typically 24" measured from the heel of the forks and 24" up, for most sit-down counterbalance fork trucks. Larger capacity trucks may use a 36" or 48" load center distance. This information is found on the truck’s data plate, and generally depicts an evenly distributed load in the form of a 48" cube box with its center of gravity at 24" both side to side and front to back within the cube, and the load raised a given distance from the floor. The trained operator uses this information to determine if the actual load being lifted is within the safe lifting parameters. 

Almost all counterbalanced powered industrial trucks have a three-point suspension system, that is, the vehicle is supported at three points. This is true even if the vehicle has four wheels. The truck's rear steer axle is attached to the truck by a pivot pin in the axle's center. When the points are connected with imaginary lines, this three-point support forms a triangle called the stability triangle. 

When the vehicle's load center falls within the stability triangle the vehicle is stable and will not tip over. However, when the vehicle load combination falls outside the stability triangle, the vehicle is unstable and may tip over. 

When the truck is loaded to its maximum capacity, the combined center of gravity of the vehicle and load falls through the center of the front axle. This is considered its threshold of stability. 

American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) standard B56.1, 2000, Safety Standard for Low Lift and High Lift Trucks, paragraph 7.38 discusses fork extensions. The con-sensus standard limits the length of the fork extension to 150% of the supporting fork length. The standard goes on to state that the rated load center of the fork extension should be 50% of the fork extension supporting length. 

The following example considers only longitudinal stability although the same theory is applied to lateral stability. A 3000 pound truck with a 24 inch load center (4 foot forks) creates a 72,000 inch-pound load moment (3000 pound capacity times the 24 inch load center). A four foot supporting fork can be extended six feet with extension forks according to ASME B56.1. Six  foot extension forks have a load center at three feet. With the extension installed on the 3000 pound truck, the maximum safe carrying capacity of the truck is 72,000 divided by the new 36 inch load center (3 foot =36 inches) or 2000 pounds at the three foot load center. Fork extensions do not increase the lifting capacity of a truck. What they do is better stabilize longer loads. 

Although the OSHA standard 19Published by the Connecticut Department of Labor, Project Management Office.178 does not specifically discuss fork extensions, OSHA will generally accept an employer’s actions if they comply with a consensus standard. 

Powered Industrial Truck Fork Extensions

Industrial powered trucks (fork trucks) can be equipped with attachments to increase their usefulness. Boom extensions, hoppers, rug rams, drum carrier/rotators, cylinder caddies, and drum grippers are often seen on the manufacturing floor. These modifications and additions affect capacity and safe op-eration and therefore must have the truck manufacturers prior written approval. With the modification, the truck’s capacity, operation, and maintenance instruction plates, tags, or decals must be changed to indicate the truck’s new capacity rating.  

Many of these attachments are not manufactured by the truck manufacturer. Truck manufacturers may not approve a product they are not familiar with. OSHA recognizes the truck manu-facturers reluctance to approve the attachment and therefore will accept approval from a qualified Registered Professional Engineer (RPE) after the employer receives no response or a negative response from the powered industrial truck manufac-turer. If the manufacturers response was negative, then the en-gineer, prior to granting approval for the modification or addi-tion, would need to perform a safety analysis and address all safety and/or structural issues contained in the manufacturers disapproval.  Additional points to remember:

  • The discussion above considers a static condition. An op-erator that drives fast, erratically, applies the brakes abruptly, and turns quickly can easily tip the truck over.
     

  • A load which is not near the maximum capacity of the vehicle but is biased toward the fork tips can easily create an unstable condition.
     

  • The fork extension and attachment weight must be consid-ered as part of the payload. Reduce the overall capacity by the weight of the fork extension or attachment.
     

  • A load’s center of gravity can be approximated by the op-erator. If conditions will allow, place the load on a length of pipe which will act as a fulcrum. Adjust the pipe until the load is balanced. This is the center of gravity of the load and the distance from the side of the load to the fulcrum point is the load center.  The load center distance can be used by the op-erator to calculate the truck’s safe lifting capacity.
     

  • Adding more counterbalance weight to the truck moves the truck’s center of gravity toward the truck's rear steer axle which is attached to the truck by a pivot pin in the axle's cen-ter. This is unstable because the truck is in a very narrow band of stability.
     

  • If while carrying a load the steering feels ‘light’, the truck is unstable and the operator has very little control over the truck.
     

  • When traveling with a load keep the load as low as possible.

The maximum weight capacity of a truck can be misleading to the uninformed. When purchasing a truck, consider your ac-tual load weight and configuration, and any fork extensions, modifications and attachments you may use. Also consider the height the load will be raised to and the surface driven on. Re-ceive written approval from the truck manufacturer for the modification or attachment, or from a qualified RPE. Identify the new capacity of the truck by replacing the truck’s data plate.


Emphasis Program: Powered Industrial Trucks 

On December 1, 1998, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration published the Powered Industrial Truck (PIT) Operator Training; Final Rule, 29 CFR Parts 19Published by the Connecticut Department of Labor, Project Management Office, 1915, 1917, 1918, and 1926. This final rule revised 19Published by the Connecticut Department of Labor, Project Management Office.178 Paragraph (l) and was intended to reduce the number of serious injuries and deaths by improving the training for PIT operators. 

The new standard requires PIT operator training that is based on the operator’s prior knowledge and skill, the type of PIT being operated in the workplace, the hazards of the workplace, and the opera-tor’s demonstrated ability to operate a PIT. The final rule also requires refresher training if the operator is involved in an acci-dent or “near miss” or has been observed operating a PIT in an unsafe manner. Evaluations of operators’ performance are also required by the new requirement paragraph. 

Since 2002, there has been an OSHA Region 1 Emphasis Program designed to reduce injuries and fatalities related to PITs. OSHA estimates that there are approximately 1.5 million workers in the United States who operate PITs and these vehicles are a significant source of serious and fatal injuries.  PITs are used in almost all industries and on almost all construction sites to move, raise, lower, or handle materials. A BLS study indicates that industrial truck related fatalities in private industry have increased steadily from 79 in 1992, to a high of 146 in 2000. This study also indicated 50% of the forklift fatalities occurred in manufacturing and construction with the remainder of fatalities in mining, agriculture, transportation, wholesale, retail, and services. A review of OSHA Region 1 statistics from 1992 through 2001 indicated that there were 35 PIT related fatalities which accounted for 9% of all fatalities during that time period.


Powered Industrial Trucks: OSHA Personnel Lifting Provision
By John Able, CSP
 

Special provisions should be used when using Powered Industrial Trucks to lift personnel.  Effective July 2, 2003, OSHA removed and reserved 29 CFR 19Published by the Connecticut Department of Labor, Project Management Office.178(m)(12)(i) through (iii) because this section was invalidly promulgated from a non-mandatory provision of a national consensus standard. When OSHA adopted the standard from ANSI B56.1-1969 in 1971, the consensus standard language was re-vised, making it appear to be a mandatory provision of the OSHA Standard when in fact the language in the consensus standard was advisory.  

This action does not indicate that the underlying hazard addressed by these provisions is not serious. In-deed, if proper equipment, procedures and training are not provided, the lifting of personnel with powered in-dustrial trucks poses hazards likely to cause death or serious injury to employees.  As noted in OSHA’s 1998 amendment to the Powered Industrial Trucks Standard, a significant percentage (4 to 14% depending on the study) of the Published by the Connecticut Department of Labor, Project Management Office0 deaths and 95,000 injuries per year that in-volve powered industrial trucks result from falls from personnel lifting.  

The first thing an employer should do is deter-mine if the fork truck manufacturer allows the use of personnel lifting platforms. If this activity is allowed by the manufacturer, a new data plate should be obtained and installed on the vehicle.  Only after permission has been received from the manufacturer can the employer move forward with the proper equipment, procedures, training, evaluation and supervision to prevent serious injury or death during lifting of personnel operations.  

The most recent American Society of Mechanical Engineers’ (ASME) current standard for powered in-dustrial trucks (ASME B56.1 – 2000) addresses the hazards concerning lifting of personnel.  Unfortunately, OSHA Standards cannot be updated as readily as national consensus standards which are typically reviewed on a cyclical basis.  Employers should keep in close touch with experts in the field, ask lots of questions, and use all available resources to help ensure a safe work-place for all employees.


Sharp Update ... 

On September 26, 2006, the New Hampshire De-partment of Environmental Services hosted the 4th annual US DOL OSHA Region 1 Safety and Health Achievement Recognition Program (SHARP) Luncheon.  Approximately 75 people attended the event which took place at the Urban Forestry Center, Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Oxley, Inc. of Branford Connecticut and Mid-western Connecticut Council on Alcoholism of Danbury, Connecticut were honored as first time recipients of the SHARP award. 

Connecticut Safety Society 

During the recent holidays The Connecticut Safety Society collected over 140 Teddy bears and assorted stuffed animals. They were donated to The Hartford Interval House for distribution.


Hazard Corner … 

Fork Truck Instability Incident - Mr. Robert Kowalski,  Area Director Bridgeport Office U.S. Department of Labor– OSHA 

According to the U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, an average of Published by the Connecticut Department of Labor, Project Management Office0 workers are killed and 20,000 are seriously injured each year as a result of fork truck accidents. A significant number of these incidents can be directly related to fork truck instability. 

On a Friday afternoon in July, the Bridgeport Area Office of the USDOL-OSHA received a call from a Police De-partment in Southern Connecticut.  A worker at a local car dealership had been involved in a fork truck incident.  The worker had been assisting a neighboring business in the unloading of a tractor-trailer. Merchandise was being off loaded from the trailer and placed in a smaller vehicle. The worker had just placed a large item into the bed of the pickup.  The fork truck was placed in reverse and the worker quickly backed up the fork truck, turning the steer-ing wheel sharply. This motion caused the fork truck to flip onto its side, ejecting the worker.  The worker became pinned under the overhead protection cage, sustaining a mortal injury. 

An investigation into the incident revealed the following: 

  • The worker had not been trained in the proper operation of the fork truck.
  • The fork truck had not been equipped with any type of operator restraint.
  • When the fork truck was placed in reverse, the forks were still raised.

In the “Employer’s Guide to Material Handing Safety” under the section entitled “Lift truck tip over” is the following “Turning too sharply with the forks raised,  your truck can tip over, even at slow speeds and with no load.” The root cause of this accident was the instability of the fork truck.  With the forks raised, the center of gravity was displaced.  Turning the steering wheel sharply with the forks raised while traveling in reverse caused the truck to tip over.  Because the operator was not wearing a seat belt, he was ejected from the seat and pinned under the over head protection cage. 

This accident could have been avoided if the following had occurred. 

  • Training of the operator in the correct operation of a fork truck.
  • Understanding the dynamics of the fork truck while operating it with or without a load.
  • The installation and use of a restraint system to prevent the operator from being ejected from the fork truck.

The accident depicted above occurred in July 1995.  However as recently as October 2006, the Bridgeport Area Office has investigated another fatality with the exact same circumstances.


CONN-OSHA ~ Training Update... 

Breakfast Roundtable. This discussion Group meets the third Tuesday of every month and the meetings are held from 8:15 am to 9:45 am. Pre-registration is required. To be placed on the e-mail distribution list, call John Able at (860) 263-6902 or email able.john@dol.gov 

Recordkeeping OSHA 300 February 16. The purpose of this workshop is to introduce the requirements and procedures related to the OSHA 300 Log. The presentation will cover recording requirements, include a discussion of the employee/employer relationship, which pre-existing cases can be limited in the OSHA forms, and exceptions for some categories of injuries and illnesses. 

Powered Industrial Trucks  February 6 and May 8. Powered Industrial Truck Standard OSHA’s 29 CFR 19Published by the Connecticut Department of Labor, Project Management Office.178. This 3-hour workshop introduces participants to OSHA’s Powered Industrial Truck standard and includes an in-depth review of operator training. 

Workplace Ergonomics March 13. Come and learn how to enhance your employees’ moral, reduce workers’ compensation costs and be a leader in creating a safe workplace. Class participants will learn how to create an ergonomically sound office environment and how to develop a comprehensive and successful ergonomic program. 

Work Zone Safety April 12. Basic guidelines for work zone traffic control and the requirements of Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) with particular emphasis on short term work sites on roads and streets in rural and small urban areas will be presented. 

Classes are free and held at 200 Folly Brook Boulevard, Wethersfield, CT in Conference Room A from 9 am - 12 noon unless noted.  To register, contact  John Able at (860) 263-6902 or able.john@dol.gov Pre-registration is required.

Fatality & Casualty Reporting 

State & Town: CONN-OSHA (860) 263-6946 (local) or 1-866-241-4060 (toll-free)

Private Employers: Report to Federal OSHA at 1-800-321-OSHA(6742)

CONN-OSHA Quarterly Index

Last Updated: March 01, 2017


200 Folly Brook Boulevard, Wethersfield, CT 06109 / Phone: 860-263-6000

Home | CT.gov Home Send Feedback
State of Connecticut Disclaimer and Privacy Policy. Copyright 2002 - present year