- October 25, 2005
Persky v. Cendant
Corporation (PDF, 126KB)
Connecticut Supreme Court case. When
analyzing interference claim under Family and Medical Leave Law,
courts should use the strict liability standard, which does not
require that the employee alleging a claim of interference prove
the employer's intent.
-
March 8, 2004
B. Kim Persky v. Cendant
Corporation (PDF, 1493KB)
Docket No. CV 03-0520241S (Judge Pinkus) (Appeal to Supreme Court pending.)
The Superior Court found that the Commissioner
correctly applied a strict liability standard and that there was substantial
evidence in the record to support the Commissioner’s conclusions.
-
February 6, 2003
A. Kim
Persky v. Cendant Corporation (PDF, 2.7MB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 99-50
After May 24, 1999, when the Complainant’s leave
expired, the Commissioner found that the Complainant’s replacement performed
duties that were not substantially different in terms of difficulty or skill
level from those performed by the Complainant before she took her leave. The
Commissioner found that the Complainant’s job had not been eliminated and that
the Complainant’s position was still available.
-
September 19, 2005
Jen Duquette v.
Kenyon Oil Company (PDF, 317KB)
Failure of Complaintant to appear at hearing.
-
April 22, 2005
Charles H. Gardner
v. Valerie Manor (PDF, 448KB)
Complaintant failed to appear at hearing and Commissioner
concluded Complaintant had not met its burden of proving an FMLA
violation.
- March 18, 2004
Patrick
Marando, Jr. v. Stop and Shop, Inc. (PDF,
1409KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 2000-44
The employer had a uniformly enforced policy
that prohibits outside employment during a period of leave. The
Commissioner held that the employer had a legitimate reason for discharging
the Complainant under its policy prohibiting certain outside employment
while on leave for any reason.
-
March 14,
2003
Maribeth Shields v.
Alternatives, Inc.
(PDF, 107KB)
Decision of the
Commissioner, FM 98-37
The Complainant was appointed to fill an interim
position and that because she was hired only for a specific term, the
Respondent did not have an obligation to restore the Complainant that position
upon the expiration of her leave because the original position as it existed
prior to the Complainant’s leave no longer existed.
-
April 1,
2002
Rebecca Maheu v Webster
Bank
(PDF, 1.4MB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 2001-24
Case dismissed for Complainant’s failure to
appear and prosecute her own case. The hearing officer had evidence of
the Complainant’s receipt of the notice of the hearing date.
-
February 4, 2002
Roman
Ostrowski v. Guida’s Dairy Products (PDF, 136KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 2000-53
The Complainant lacked the one thousand (1000)
hours required to be an ‘eligible employee’ under the FMLA.
-
August 30, 2001
David
Schumack v. Super Kmart
(PDF, 1.5MB)
Decision of the Commission, FM 99-2
The Commissioner found that a violation of the
FMLA had occurred and awarded the Complainant $36,704.97 in damages. He found
that the Complainant’s final one hour tardiness should have been designated as
FMLA leave and that the decision to discharge the Complainant for his absences
included that last incident.
-
August 16, 2001
Nancy
Custin v. Boise Cascade (PDF, 253KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 97-3
An “employer,”
for purposes of the FMLA, must employ 75 or more employees in order to be
subject to the
Act. In this case, the employer employed less than the requisite
number of
employees during
all relevant times. The Commissioner rejected the argument that for the
purposes of the
75 or more requirement, the Department of Labor must look outside the
boundaries of
Connecticut.
-
March 9, 2001
Marilyn Clare v.
Catholic Family Services (PDF, 930KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 99-44
The decision found that the Respondent
appropriately asked for additional medical information for clarification
purposes. Despite the Respondent’s requests, the Complainant did not submit
any additional medical documentation until the time of her grievance. The
Commission found that the Complainant failed to meet her obligations under the
FMLA and the Respondent did not violate any provision of the FMLA.
-
May 16, 2000
David
Larensen v. Konica Business Machines U.S.A., Inc. (PDF, 435KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 9843
The Commissioner did not find good cause for the
late filing.
-
January 12, 2000
Andrew Elliott v. Pratt & Whitney (PDF, 687KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 98-33
The Complainant sought advice and guidance
from several attorneys and his medical condition did not prevent him from
filing complaints in other form. The Commissioner did not find good
cause for the late filing.
-
December 4, 1998
Susan
Mendes v. St. Joseph College (PDF, 1.2MB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 96-34
The complaint filed with the Department of Labor
in November of 1996 was filed more than 180 days after the employer action
which prompted the complaint. The remaining issue was whether the
Complainant had good cause for the late filing. The Complainant was
represented by counsel since at least August of 1994 and a complaint was filed
in another forum. Consequently, the Commissioner did not find good cause for
the late filing.
-
June 16, 1998
Barbara
Gierla v. Aetna Life Insurance (PDF, 549KB)
Proposed Decision of the Hearing
Officer, FM 95-31
Proposed
decision never became final, parties settled this matter and withdrew the
complaint.
-
December 3, 1997
Inez Hales
v. Prudential Insurance (PDF, 1.2MB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 94-44
Several months prior to her discharge, the
Complainant was placed on probation for low production. The discharge was for
a legitimate nondiscrimination reason and the Complainant did not offer any
evidence that the decision was pretextual.
- October 31, 1997
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 93-4. Appealed to Superior
Court, but appeal withdrawn
pursuant to a settlement in August of 1998. A violation was
found because the decision to
terminate the Complainant was not made prior to her leave nor
were there newly discovered
reasons for her termination while she was out on leave.
-
September 17, 1997
Lisa
Lauder v. Sodexho (PDF, 370KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 94-7
The elimination of the Complainant’s position
was similar to the elimination of an entire division. She was not discharged
because she exercised her rights under the FMLA.
-
August 8, 1996
Paula S. Friedman v. Gardner
Merchant (PDF, 649KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 91-2
There was no violation of the FMLA
because the discharge took place outside of the protected
period.
-
August 28, 1995
Sharon Baker
v. General Dynamics (PDF, 2.3MB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 92-6
The Employer placed the Complainant on FMLA
prior to her maternity leave because the Complainant was unable to perform
her job. Placing the Complainant on FMLA leave prior to the birth of her
child did not entitle the Complainant to additional weeks of leave after
the expiration of her statutory FMLA entitlement.
-
July 17, 1995
Jeanne
Cretella v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield (PDF, 1.1MB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 93-9
In the absence of any first-hand testimony from
the Complainant, good cause for the late filing was not found.
-
January 18, 1995
Catherine
Haggquist v. Greenwich Hospital Association, Inc. (PDF 525KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 91-12
This case involved a leave that began prior to
the existence of the FMLA. There is nothing in the express language or
legislative history that indicates that the FMLA was intended to operate
retrospectively to its date of enactment.
-
October 4, 1994
Pamela
Moody v. Sweet Life Foods (PDF, 1.5MB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 93-5
The Respondent employer attempted to make
arrangements to temporarily fill the position in the Complainant’s absence.
When unable to do so, the Respondent simply reassigned the duties to existing
and new staff members and found this solution to be workable. The FMLA
clearly does not excuse an employer from compliance simply because an employer
learns in an employee’s absence that it can ‘make do’ without that employee.
The Employer failed to restore the Complainant to her original position from
which she exercised her rights to FMLA.
-
June 29, 1994
Carolyn McCarthy v. Bristol
Press (PDF, 1171KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 93-15
The Complainant did not establish
circumstances which would have prevented a reasonably prudent
individual in the exercise of due diligence from the timely
filing of her complaint and thus had not shown good cause for
her untimely filing.
-
May 25, 1994
Nancy Cannon
v. Middlesex Hospital (PDF, 412KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM-91-10
There was
nothing in the record to substantiate that the Complainant was suffering
from a “serious illness.”
-
January 10, 1994
Martha
Lanza v. United Cable (PDF, 1.8MB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 92-4
The Respondent violated the FMLA through its
attendance policy, which provided that corrective action could be taken if an
employee took time off for legitimate illness with proper medical
documentation and through its performance evaluation procedure, in which an
individual’s performance evaluation was negatively affected by the
individual’s exercise of the right to a medical leave protected by the FMLA.
-
December 23, 1992
Diane
Cormier v. Textron Lycoming (PDF, 961KB)
Decision of the Commissioner, FM 92-1
The Complainant failed to sustain her burden of
proving that the Employer did not restore her to her original position. Upon
the Complainant’s return to work, neither the nature nor the number of the
Complainant’s duties was substantially diminished by the Employer.